Confusion And Quibbling At Mayor’s Preservation Task Force Meeting

 

A 200-year-old home comes down at 6649 Ridge Avenue. | Photo: Michael Bixler

Early this morning Mayor Kenney’s Historic Preservation Task Force held its 6th public meeting following the release of their draft white paper Preservation in Philadelphia on Wednesday, March 14. The draft, open for public comment, seeks to summarize the state of preservation in Philadelphia. The announcement came with an appeal for public input on the document itself and on a list of 30 issues identified by the Task Force thus far.

For the first 15 minutes of the meeting audience members were encouraged to participate in an exercise in which they could “vote” on which issues they felt to be the most urgent. The exercise began smoothly enough as members and the dozen or so attendees moved between poster-sized lists, placing stickers near issues that they wished to see prioritized. Some resolutions, including “reviewing the city tax abatement” and “linking incentives, significance, and regulation” received a number of votes while others, such as “do no harm” and “protection/regulation for ‘zones of wonderfulness’” received few to none. For those who missed the meeting and wish to provide input, the activity is also available online.

As members gathered around the table to officially kick off the discussion, moderated by vice chair Dominique Hawkins, the subdued order quickly devolved into a frustrated attempt to sort out the logistics of just how individual issues should be assigned and addressed by members of the group. Beginning with the topics which received the most initial votes, Hawkins and fellow Task Force members began assigning issues to the group’s various subcommittees, a system which didn’t seem to sit well with all of the members.

Many voiced the opinion that rather than be limited to one of the four subcommittees, issues should be addressed laterally, meaning that any member of the greater Task Force should have the option of providing input on any issue, not just those delegated to their particular subcommittee. Others, including Ballard Spahr attorney Matt McClure, who co-chairs the Regulating Preservation Outcomes committee with Hawkins, felt that not delegating issues to individual subcommittees would undermine the work that those committees had already put in. After a few more attempts to get through the list sparked more discussion, it was partially resolved that issues, when relevant to multiple subcommittee topics, would be assigned to multiple subcommittees and meeting times to discuss each topic would be made available to all Task Force members.

Demolition of New Macedonia Church on Corinthian Street was recently completed. The historic stone building had been part of Fairmount’s neighborhood fabric since the late 1800s. | Photo: Michael Bixler

Moving into the second half of the meeting evoked feelings of déjà vu from the audience as Hawkins individually called on members to respond to basic, open-ended questions like “What are we preserving?” and “What exactly is it that we are trying to save in Philadelphia?” The exercise continued for the remainder of the time as members proceeded to give their own, subjective takes on the challenges and complications of preservation in the city, citing common themes including: the challenge of balancing preservation with growth and development, financial burdens that may be imposed by preservation and how they need to be better managed, the significance of historic places to communities, and the importance of the craftsmanship and quality embodied in historic buildings. While members expressed thoughtful and valid points of concern, some members in the audience felt that waxing poetic about what preservation means and why it should be prioritized did not feel like an effective way to spend half of a public meeting, especially this far along in the process.

Public comment was limited to 15 minutes at the end of the meeting. Paul Steinke, executive director of the Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia posed the first question and requested an explanation as to why the Regulating Preservation Outcomes Committee is the sole subcommittee that is “closed” to other members of the Task Force. According to the white paper, the Regulation subcommittee is “evaluating the city’s preservation ordinance and the PHC’s Rules and Regulations to address current and future preservation needs.” Moving on to other comments, Steinke’s question was recorded, but left unanswered as public comments continued, which expressed the importance of incentivizing preservation for lower-income property owners and the need for more regulatory tools to support preservation.

It is clearly no small feat to organize such a large group, but the general disorganization and lack of focus on more substantive discussion felt like a familiar lost opportunity. Although the Task Force presents itself as an entity open to public input, actual opportunities for input thus far have felt highly controlled and limited to superficial realms. While previous meetings have been open to the public, subcommittee meetings are not, and only one public meeting has been specifically devoted to public comment. Considering the urgency of the issues surrounding preservation in the city, this kind of public participation can feel like lip service and, potentially, alienate engaged citizens from the process.

The draft white paper itself is an 18 page overview of existing regulations, economic incentives, and planning and advocacy efforts related to preservation within the city and state along with a summary of findings by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. It is the first of the group’s three set deliverables. The next paper will focus on best practices identified within the subcommittees to address Philadelphia’s specific challenges. With a limited amount of time left–the final report is due in December 2018–the pressure is on for the group to develop some substantive recommendations. Whether the public is privy to the actual process of how they go about doing so remains to be seen.

About the author

Starr Herr-Cardillo is a staff writer for Hidden City Daily. She was born and raised in Tucson, Arizona and is a graduate of University of Pennsylvania's historic preservation program. Herr-Cardillo was drawn to the field by a deep affinity for adobe and vernacular architecture. She is gradually being won over by Philadelphia's overwhelming historic building stock and cloudier climate.



5 Comments


  1. Thank you for your insightful coverage of these Task Force events. Discouraging as they may be (and difficult for those with 9-5 jobs to attend), they are also revealing and, for better or worse, likely to have a lasting impact on local preservation policy. Focusing narrowly on the wording of the Ordinance or broadly on subjective philosophical questions (“What does preservation mean to YOU?”) are both ways of evading harder questions about the ways the ordinance has been administered in recent years or the lack of political will to achieve meaningful reform. If there’s one good thing that’s come out of the process, it’s heightened and demonstrable public interest in these issues. With that, however, comes the risk of alienation and disillusionment you mention. What a missed opportunity that outcome would be. NOTE to Hidden City editors: please sustain your attention to this stuff. It matters.

  2. Alas, it seems the mayor’s insistence that every possible group in the city be represented has created a virtual UN of a commission that will never be able to move forward.

  3. Basically, the form of the task force was great. But, since the last meeting I’ve attended, voices, participation and comments were given but nothing has changed; neither the City, the L&I, building dept, Historical committee and or any leadership especially the councilmen where the district involved is doing anything to safe the history of the historical buildings. What a circus!

  4. Ths is an excellent, albeit far too polite, summary of a disastrous meeting, and an increasingly worrisome process. From the initial white paper being issued 3 months late, to the lack of any true effort at engaging the public (a 15-minute comment period at 10:15 am on a weekday?) to the hour-long free-form “What IS preservation?” question, this meeting showed a task force that appears both rudderless and clueless. There are many good people on the task force, and it’s an impressive array of talent and expertise, all of which is at risk of being squandered. Here’s hoping that things improve – they certainly can’t get much worse.

  5. I make the odds 8 to 1 that this task force (what a concept!) will break apart before they finish their ‘task’. Meanwhile out in the real world the City still has a Historic Commission that doesn’t want to save any more buildings or form any more Districts. What a complete disconnect. I hope the good Mayor is pleased.

Leave a Reply

Comment moderation is enabled, no need to resubmit any comments posted.

Recent Posts
Defending Philly History From 3,000 Miles Away

Defending Philly History From 3,000 Miles Away

October 17, 2018  |  Vantage

Joshua Bevan knew he had to act after discovering the architectural beauty of Belmont. From his home in San Francisco he mobilized to nominate a neighborhood landmark for historic designation. In this essay Bevan describes his journey between the Bay Area and Philly to protect the McGaw Mansion > more

Design Coalition Aims To Bridge The Old-New Divide

Design Coalition Aims To Bridge The Old-New Divide

October 12, 2018  |  Walk the Walk

Move over Miami, the Philadelphia Design District is getting ready for some time in the spotlight. The coalition of gallery owners, artisans, and tech startups want to transform Old City into a hive of contemporary design, while preserving the neighborhood's historic character. Joe Brin takes a look inside the idea with co-founder Eugenie Perret > more

Germantown Boys & Girls Club Compromise Brings Peace To Penn Street

Germantown Boys & Girls Club Compromise Brings Peace To Penn Street

October 9, 2018  |  News

Owners of Germantown Boys and Girls Club reach an agreement with preservationists after two years of heated debate. Starr Herr-Cardillo has the news > more

Shakespeare & Co. Brings Old Bank Back To Life

Shakespeare & Co. Brings Old Bank Back To Life

October 4, 2018  |  Buzz

Manhattan-based bookstore and café revives an old banking storefront in Rittenhouse Square. Michael Bixler takes a look > more

Historic Districts Make A Comeback

Historic Districts Make A Comeback

October 2, 2018  |  Vantage

After nearly a decade of lost opportunities, creative new strategies emerge for protecting Philadelphia's historic neighborhoods > more

Bearing Witness To Destruction On Christian Street

Bearing Witness To Destruction On Christian Street

September 28, 2018  |  Vantage

This summer contributor Mickey Herr recorded the slow demolition of Christian Street Baptist Church from the beginning to the end. In this photo essay she shares what it was like to watch a 128-year-old neighborhood landmark being reduced to rubble > more