Without so much as an opening whistle, contractors showed up on Monday for Day One* of the job that will reactivate a regional landmark for the first time in 30 years when it opens in 2016. SEPTA closed the Manayunk Bridge in 1986 out of safety concerns and low ridership on its Ivy Ridge regional rail line, which since then has terminated in Cynwyd, still its lowest ridden line. Now, after years of planning, the bridge is ready to reemerge as the centerpiece of the region’s trail network, bringing Lower Merion Township and Manayunk—and more specifically, the Cynwyd Heritage Trail and Ivy Ridge Trail—together.
Ed. Note: the Philadelphia Streets Department, who is coordinating the project, informed workers that the Notice to Proceed was officially this past Monday, and that actual construction will begin within a few weeks.
Blackwood, New Jersey’s A.P. Construction leads the $4.2 million project, paid for by an assortment of funds, including PennDOT’s Pennsylvania Community Transportation Initiative ($1.3 million) and Surface Transportation Program ($1.1 million), $500,000 from the Pennsylvania DCNR Community Conservation Partnerships Program Grant, which Lower Merion Township spearheaded, $250,000 from the township’s capital funds, and additional sources. Lower Merion’s participation is crucial, of course, as they initiated the successful Cynwyd Heritage Trail, and a new trail across the Manayunk Bridge will provide access to the Schuylkill River Trail system as well as an alternate route to Main Street restaurants and bars.
Like so many of the bridges across the Schuylkill, the Manayunk Bridge is incredibly complex. As it curves across the river, it also spans the SEPTA Manayunk/Norristown regional rail line, Green Lane, Main Street, the Schuylkill Canal and Tow Path, Venice Island, the river itself, the Schuylkill Expressway, and the Norfolk Southern railroad tracks, east to west. On top of that, the catenaries overhead carry live wires owned by Amtrak and PECO. SEPTA will continue to own the bridge and will lease its surface to Philadelphia Parks & Recreation, who will administer the trail upon its opening, and Lower Merion Township, who’ll maintain the western side of the bridge. At the bridge’s centerpoint, a line will be painted marking the border of Philadelphia and Montgomery Counties directly above the river.
The bridge measures just under a half-mile from end to end, 30′ wide, with nine open-spandrel, reinforced concrete arches flanked on either end by steel plate girder sections over the railroad tracks on both sides of the river. In bringing the bridge up to modern standards, new fencing will be installed on top of the guard rails already there: a 4’8′ steel mesh over the Schuylkill, providing sweeping views of the river, Manayunk and the surrounding hills, a 10′ section over I-76, and a 14′ fence over the SEPTA and Norfolk Southern tracks that provide opportunity for artistic interpretation, such as string lights.

Manayunk Bridge under construction next to the previous S-bridge, demolished after the Manayunk Bridge’s completion in 1918 | Photo: Engineering News-Record, May 24, 1917
The Pennsylvania Railroad’s Schuylkill Division constructed the bridge from 1916-18, replacing an earlier S-shaped bridge built in 1883. Harry Garforth, Amtrak’s Principal Officer of Northeast Corridor Service Planning and a bona fide railroad historian, explains why that was necessary:
“The Schuylkill Valley Branch was built to provide the PRR a more direct routing between anthracite coal fields and the Port of Philadelphia for shipment to markets up and down the coast. The earlier structure (the so called ‘S’ Bridge) was not built to support heavier train movements which came later as coal-hopper car and locomotive size increased. It also limited speed across the bridge due to the sharp curvature on the approaches on each side.”
The new bridge, along with another across the Schuylkill at Phoenixville, allowed for heavier loads and higher speeds; it earned a feature story in the May 24, 1917 issue of Engineering News-Record as it was under construction. The PRR’s Chief Engineer Alexander C. Shand and Engineer of Bridges and Buildings H.R. Leonard designed the bridge in 1915. Philadelphian T.L. Eyre oversaw its construction.
After the demise of the Pennsylvania Railroad, Penn Central (a merger of PRR and New York Central) continued to operate freight trains over the bridge until 1976, at which time Conrail assumed freight duties from Penn Central and discontinued freight across the bridge. (Amtrak took over Penn Central’s passenger service.) SEPTA’s R6 Ivy Ridge line, now the Cynwyd Line, continued past the current terminus at Cynwyd to Barmouth Station, a popular early-20th Century spot for family outings in the West Laurel Hill and Westminster Cemeteries which the rail line bisects, and across the bridge to the Manayunk and Ivy Ridge upper stations.
The former, nicknamed the “Manayunk West” station to avoid confusion with the extant Manayunk Station which serves the Manayunk/Norristown Line, was demolished after 1986 and has served as an unauthorized parking lot for neighbors since. The site of the old station, at Dupont and High Streets, will be spruced up as a gateway plaza and entrance to the trail, eventually leading to the Ivy Ridge Trail, whose planning is underway now. That trail will follow on the former SEPTA line to where it meets up with the Schuylkill River Trail near the current Ivy Ridge Station. Until then, hikers and bikers coming east across the bridge can access the SRT via High Street to Leverington Avenue and under the trestle to the Tow Path access at Main Street.
All of it adds up to a significant benchmark in connecting The Circuit, the vision for a fully connected trail system across the Philadelphia region. It’s a huge moment for Sarah Clark Stuart, Deputy Director of the Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia and champion for The Circuit. “I’m thrilled that the Circuit is the reason why the bridge is being repurposed and re-enlivened to connect two communities that were cut off from one another by I-76 in the mid-50s,” she says. “Lower Merion Township has residents who need more places to spend their money and Manayunk needs more visitors who don’t have to come in cars. It’s also wonderful that Manayunk will have a new bicycle facility that is very different from the canal tow path and Main Street. It should attract more families and transportation bicyclists to Manayunk and will provide ‘road’ cyclists a new way to get to Manayunk (through Lower Merion Township).”

Differing colors of concrete will demarcate pedestrian and bicycle paths on the bridge’s deck | Photo: Bradley Maule
Liz Smith, SEPTA’s Manager of Long Range Planning, envisions the bridge as an attraction too. “The visibility of the project is what’s unique,” she says. “People on the Schuylkill Expressway, Main Street, regional rail, and the neighborhoods will see people biking and taking in views and want to go up there.” Prior to coming on at SEPTA last year, Smith worked for six years at the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, where she worked extensively on the planning of this project with stakeholders including SEPTA, Lower Merion Township, the Manayunk Development Corporation, and others.
Kay Sykora, Executive Director of Destination Schuylkill River, a project of the Manayunk Development Corporation, looks forward to her community’s landmark ushering in a new era, too. “I’m most excited about the Manayunk Bridge highlighting The Circuit for the region,” she says. “It will be an amazing symbol that talks about the future of the trail system.”
And a symbol it is. More than “The Wall” at the Cycling Classic or the staircases leading to Roxborough above, the Manayunk Bridge serves as the riverside neighborhood’s go-to icon. Its arches are echoed in other nearby buildings including a 1920s firehouse, a 1980s bank, and a 2000s apartment building whose ground floor parking garage is masked by the same arch motif as the bridge. The bridge design is also replicated on the tap handles at Manayunk Brewpub, a mile or so down the canal at the southern end of the Tow Path.

Um, Google? Missing something here, aren’t we? | Google Maps
SEPTA removed the tracks from the former Ivy Ridge line in 2010 as a precursor to the trail, but has built into its lease with the City and Township that the bridge must be reverted to passenger rail use if demand calls for it. Given the Cynwyd line’s light use and the redundancy of the Ivy Ridge and Manayunk stations, that seems highly unlikely. As part of the project, SEPTA will also replace the extant ballast, polluted from 60 years’ coal rail service, with newer, light ballast that will help drain the new surface to be built on top of it.
Construction on the trail is expected to take 12-18 months, with an opening planned for late 2015-early 2016. And when it does, it will only include Phase One features. Due to budget constraints, accessory features like lighting, furniture, and landscaping will wait for a future phase. Conduits will be installed for future lighting, but the first item of business is just getting it open. Until that future phase, a gate will close the trail at dusk.
But with so visible, and handsome, a node in a greater network, demand will no doubt expedite improvements like lighting and benches for people to enjoy the views. “The Bridge itself is an elegant example of engineering and workmanship from the early 1900s that thankfully has been preserved for our generation,” says the Bicycle Coalition’s Stuart.
The bridge was most recently fully repaired by SEPTA in 1999 and it was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 2011, so chances are good that it will remain to serve future generations, too. And given plans to extend the trail out past Ivy Ridge and another to spur the Cynwyd Trail under I-76 through the O’Neill Properties (adjacent the Expressway) and back onto Main Street across the currently inactive Pencoyd Bridge, its vitality and identity to Manayunk will be preserved in the process.
* * *
To launch a gallery of the Manayunk Bridge and the views it provides, click any of the images below. Photos by Bradley Maule, renderings by PennDOT and Whitman, Requardt & Associates, historic photos via Engineering News-Record, 1917.
requirement or not, the 14 foot high fence will be an ugly ugly eyesore and make me never want to cross that span of bridge on foot again. are there REALLY that many folk trying to their themselves in front of trains??
Great article! Very excited for this trail to come online, and I loved learned about bridge’s history.
I would have liked some more factual breakdown describing what went into the $4.2M price tag. That’s quite a lot of tax-payer dollars for a project which at best will serve as a lightly-used bike trail, and at worst a continuing maintenance nightmare. I can only conclude that this project was funded by emotions of nostalgia or cronyism, rather than calculated forward-looking economic planning. Users of the trail are not the same demo that the proponents claim will come to spend money in Manayunk. Lower Merion residents, who used to come to Manayunk for the shops and restaurants, always drove their nice cars – to see and be seen. Are they realistically expected to arrive sweaty, spend their money on nice things, and then put those things in a bicycle basket? Does that happen anywhere? At most, they buy a cup of coffee or an ice cream. And if the trail closes at dusk, how will they come for dinner? SMH. Anyhow, they’ve stopped coming to Main Street long ago, the upscale shops have closed, and the restaurants changed into college bars.
nate, long-time manayunk resident
Unfortunately it was probably cronyism, that seems to be how most things get done in Philly.
Considering Pennsylvania state agencies spends 2+ billion dollars annually on the prison system I think it’s reasonable to spend a couple million on a necessary upgrade of a historical landmark that would otherwise crumble taking out cars, pedestrians, roadways and businesses on its way down.
Actually, the fence over the railroad and the Schuylkill Expressway was negotiated down to 10 feet, and doesn’t include the clunky overhang shown here. All other parts of the bridge will have a 4-1/2 foot high fence/railing that will be just the right height to lean against and view the scenery.
@nate
Oof. Dark days in Manayunk, huh? Main Street is arguably one of the healthiest commercial corridors in the city; you write as if the mills just closed.
I don’t really want to get into the whole range of issues you’re missing here but suffice it to say you should look into a couple things: trail vs. highway construction and maintenance costs per mile to gain a little sanity about the pricetag; you should look into the documented usage of the Schuylkill River Trail if you question users; there’s a good bunch of data on the economic impact of bike facilities (the Inquirer just ran a story this week focusing on the above trail’s role in sustaining businesses like In Riva-which is close to you, get sweaty and check it out!); if you really want to get crazy look at bicycle facilities’ impact on the environment: by reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) which translates into better air quality; you can dabble in the research that correlates bike facilities’ usage to health and wellbeing.
At the end of the day, when you’re feeling grim about the sad prospects of poor old Manayunk you can jump on the bridge, pedal on out to Lower Merion–chances are you’ll feel a lot better by the end!
@chris
Manayunk is not even near the top healthiest commercial corridors in the city (Center City alone has a dozen more), but that is not the focus here, unless this bridge trail intends to elevate Manayunk to the top. I don’t know of a precedent for that.
I don’t think comparing maintenance of a highway, used by thousands of commuters per day, to a half-mile bike trail over a giant aging bridge is in any way accurate. The highway (namely I-76 in this case) is an economic engine, funneling passengers and freight through Philadelphia 24/7, without which we would be completely cut off from intracounty commerce of any kind in Manayunk. Where do you think those large semis who take up the entire Green Lane intersection are coming from?
A bike trail is simply a nice addition to our parks and recreation facilities. There is a justifiable and beneficial reason to have it, just not at this great expense.
In Riva is a singular pizza joint in East Falls, not Mayanunk, and yes, I have checked it out; I guess you like their bike racks. I’m an avid biker, I love to get sweaty, and I do it on the Wissahickon trails and the Schuylkill River trail to Valley Forge along with most other riders. I’ve biked on the Cynwyd Heritage Trail once or twice, for recreation.
I don’t associate bike trails with commerce or economic development, and I think you should be skeptical of anyone who does. Biking on the Manayunk Bridge will never correlate to reduced vehicular miles or better air quality, until somebody bikes across the Manayunk bridge to go to work. When and how frequently do you expect that to happen? Where does this theoretical person work and live? I trust you won’t say he/she lives in Lower Merion and works at In Riva.
What other range of issues am I missing? I know this is all water under bridge (sorry), since the project is moving forward already, but I just want to understand why.
School budget crisis and we blow $4.2 million on a foot bridge?
To all the amateur policy wonks who’d like “more info” and “breakdowns” or feel they weren’t consulted or have other thoughts about allocation of public money for transportation infrastructure, the DVRPC, as the federally-designated Metropolitan Planning Organization, must offer a 30 day period for public comment on the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). There’s a helpful guide that walks you through the source of funds (Federal Highway Trust Funds, gas taxes apportioned to the states by formula), You can check it out here:
http://www.dvrpc.org/TIP/
Unfortunately the comment period for the 2015 TIP is over, but I’ll expect all of the interested parties on this thread to gear up for next year. You can make public comments about your particular views about transportation planning and economic development, you can even assert pet theories about cronyism influencing projects, you can even urge that federal funds, legislatively authorized by Congressional act go to local school districts! May be a better use of everyone’s time than commenting on Hidden City.
Public input at DVRPC is akin to shouting into the wind. That public comment box is a pithy replacement to the Regional Citizens Committee which was shamefully dismantled in 2011. I for one commented on the long-range Connections2040 plan via the “Choices and Voices” site; the subpar list of projects on there indicates the lack of vision the board has in truly reforming transportation options in the region.
http://www.dvrpc.org/asp/ChoicesAndVoices/
There is one issue I haven’t seen addressed: how will people get down to Main Street? Is the only exit point going to be all the way up at Ivy Ridge? That would give some justification to critics.
In general, though, I don’t understand the short-sighted negativity here… what are you doing reading a website about rethinking cities, if all you are going to do is complain when something actually gets built?