[E]merging Visions

Photo: Peter Woodall

Paul VanMeter, of Viaduct Greene, e-mails to say there is now agreement between his organization and the Reading Viaduct Project on a shared vision for the a three mile long park on the abandoned Reading and Philadelphia railroad. This in not insignificant. Sarah McEneany and John Struble, of RVP, are the visionaries who have been advocating for a High Line-style park on the viaduct since 2001. (As Martin Filler points out in a review of the second Phase of the High Line, that project had only emerged a couple of years earlier and was essentially ignored until late 2001.)

A year or so ago, VanMeter, with experience working on the High Line, and partner Liz Maile formed ViaductGreene to help reenergize the idea, which had never caught on politically. VanMeter and Maille came on the scene with a broader vision–to connect the viaduct to the rest of the City Branch, the submerged train bed that runs along Pennsylvania Avenue behind the Rodin Museum.

Now, with the Nutter administration and the Center City District in active negotiations with SEPTA and the Reading Company for access to the site, the agreement means the opportunity to work at greater scale, at a park that would run “across multiple neighborhoods and create new connections to and from the Avenue of the Arts, the Benjamin Franklin Parkway and Fairmount Park, forming the spine of a new, animated cultural campus.”

Photo: Peter Woodall

Besides “Continuous and Connective,” the other values to guide development of the park: “Green and Wild,” “Accommodating, Accessible, and Expressive,” “Historic,” “Safe,” “Fiscally Sustainable,” Environmentally Responsible.”

Tomorrow, in Possible City: thinking through next steps.

About the author

Nathaniel Popkin is co-editor of the Hidden City Daily and author of three books of non-fiction, including the forthcoming Philadelphia: Finding the Hidden City (Temple Press) and a novel, Lion and Leopard (The Head and the Hand Press). He is the senior writer of the film documentary "Philadelphia: The Great Experiment."



4 Comments


  1. Isn’t there a possibility of using the City Branch Line for an eventual subway along the Parkway? And wouldn’t that be a much, much better use?

    A potential plan is outline on the “Crossing the Line” blog is here (his assumptions of cost are too low, but still, you get the idea):

    http://philadelphia2050.blogspot.com/2011/09/costing-city-branch-line.html

  2. During meetings with SEPTA and the City, it’s been confirmed that the chances of the City footing the bill for a light rail along the City Branch are negligible to none. It’s simply too great of an investment for too short of a distance. This right-of-way, however, could be easily developed into a park, with separate pedestrian and bike lanes — imagine walking or biking through Callowhill and Chinatown North to Poplar West, Spring Garden, Logan Square, Fairmount, and Brewerytown, to the North Avenue of the Arts, CCP, the Barnes, Rodin, Philadelphia Art Museum, and Fairmount Park, all without crossing a street. Check out our Design Philadelphia events to learn more: on October 13th, VIADUCTgreene and Reading Viaduct Project will co-lead a discussion on the opportunities presented by this project, including the site’s rich historical, horticultural, and civic assets. On October 15th, we’ll co-lead a tour of the City Branch with local historian, Harry Kyriakodis. See http://www.designphiladelphia.org for more information.

  3. I did not realize this project had an under-track component to it. It reminds of a project I recently visited in Zurich Switzerland, I job very well done. Just wanted to pass this along as a potential idea as to how to engage the space below.

    Its called Im Viadukt, click below for pictures

    http://www.google.com/search?q=IM+Viadukt+Fotos&hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&sa=X&rls=en&biw=1260&bih=668&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&ei=8M6oTq6gD-W90AHZhfWcDg&ved=0CB0QsAQ

  4. NickFromGermantown

    What is there to negotiate? The Reading Company owes the city tax money for the line. Beyond that, they have been a terrible steward. That line looks so decrepit. It really hurts the neighborhood in its current state.

Leave a Reply

Comment moderation is enabled, no need to resubmit any comments posted.

Recent Posts
SEPTA Spruces Up The Underground With Downtown Link

SEPTA Spruces Up The Underground With Downtown Link

January 18, 2018  |  Harry K's Encyclopedia

Harry K. takes us on a tour of the city's extensive pedestrian underground concourse network, soon to be rebranded by SEPTA as the "Downtown Link" > more

The Vanishing Of Northeast Village

The Vanishing Of Northeast Village

January 16, 2018  |  Vantage

David Coyne traverses bramble and broken blacktop along Roosevelt Boulevard to reveal a military housing community that was evacuated and demolished in the 1960s > more

A Field Guide To Demolition

A Field Guide To Demolition

January 12, 2018  |  Vantage

Peter Woodall spotlights specific building types facing the most development pressure in four high-profile neighborhoods > more

From Prints To Trivets, Art Imitates Life Of Manhole Covers

From Prints To Trivets, Art Imitates Life Of Manhole Covers

January 11, 2018  |  Vantage

Contributor Jonathan Schmalzbach talks with a designer and a printmaker about their obsession with manhole covers and public utility as creative muse > more

Little Corner at 10th & Market Reveals Big Legacy

Little Corner at 10th & Market Reveals Big Legacy

January 8, 2018  |  The Shadow Knows

Reading Terminal, Philadelphia Mint, Drexel Institute--all prominent landmarks built by contractor Charles McCaul. The Shadow uncovers the little-known legacy of the big time builder at a nail salon on 10th Street > more

For The Love Of Carpenter Lane

For The Love Of Carpenter Lane

December 28, 2017  |  Vantage

Tony Aiello takes a stroll down Carpenter Lane in Mt. Airy where an historical timeline can be traced in architecture > more