Pearl Properties Goes Back Before The Historical Commission With Boyd Revisions

 

Pearl redo

Kinda different, kinda the same, though this time with more beige | Rendering: Eimer Design

On Friday, Pearl Properties brings its revised plans for the 1900 block of Chestnut Street, including the remains of the Boyd Theater, to the full Historical Commission. The initial design for the project was unanimously rejected by the Historical Commission’s Architecture Committee on May 26th, due largely to the lackluster proposal by Eimer Design for a 26-story apartment tower that will replace the Boyd Theater’s now demolished art deco auditorium. The committee initially recommend approving the plans, with stipulations regarding restoration of the Boyd Theater’s façade and lobby, but ultimately voted against what they viewed as a hasty, incomplete design. As Jared Brey of PlanPhilly reported, Pearl’s presentation did not include a concise picture of what building materials would be used, nor did it explain how the tower’s base would interface with the Boyd’s façade. Dominique Hawkins, the committee’s chair, summarized the shoddy proposition when she remarked that the loading dock on Samson Street was “an incredible afterthought.” Inga Saffron, in her incisive review for the Inquirer, drove the point home when she opined that the tower’s plans looked like a “charmless, bulky stack of rentable units.” Hidden City contributor Stephen Stofka viewed Pearl’s initial plans as inherently flawed due to a lack of vision for the high profile corner, providing a design that squanders density with “underscale urbanism.”

1900-1910 chestnut

Pearl Properties took a hit with their first run at mapping out 1900 Chestnut Street’s redevelopment | Rendering: Eimer Design

The revised plans lifts the Boyd’s façade out of the tower’s shadow a bit more with the return of the theater’s Art Deco glass, giving the remnents of Center City’s last movie palace more pronounced street level consideration than initially proposed. The marquee and theater lighting restoration are also included in their plans, which you can view HERE. However, the theater’s former courtyard will remain closed off and the foyer on Sansom Street is still slated for a loading dock and area for dumpsters.

Safety through simplicity appears to be the theme for the residential tower’s façade with mute, beige earth colors of “Oyster,” “Zinc,” and “Castle Grey” playing off of both the Boyd’s and Alexander Building’s limestone. The colors will interface with a grid of brushed stainless steel and flat dark gray aluminum window frames. Textured metal paneling will run the length of the tower facing Chestnut Street.

The Alexander Building will see some improvements and respectful changes. The stone façade will be repaired and a new window configuration on 19th Street will replicate the existing geometry.

Pearl Properties present its revised plans to the Philadelphia Historical Commission on Friday, June 12th at 9AM in Room 18-029 at 1515 Arch Street.

About the author

Michael Bixler is a writer, photographer, and managing editor of Hidden City Daily. He is a former arts and entertainment reporter with Mountain Xpress weekly in Asheville, North Carolina and a native of South Carolina. Bixler has a keen interest in adaptive reuse, underappreciated architecture, contemporary literature and art, and forward-thinking dialogue about people and place. mmbixler.tumblr.com

Send a message!



4 Comments


  1. The most visible change appears to be that the people in the renderings have changed their outfits and walking partners. Philadelphia deserves better.

  2. Leave it to the Philadelphia Historical Commission and their award-winning “design by committee” design philosophy. This iteration checks off all of their petty boxes, while the overwhelming majority has just seen an uninspired box merely turn into a sickly shade of beige. Nothing good ever came out of anemic PHC deliberation, and nothing ever will. I’m almost certain this will pass through the full board.

  3. The Historical Commission’s outreach is limited solely to the Boyd Facade, not any other building being proposed. Pearl has a build by right and can start construction right away with permits,does not have to appear before the Historical Commission, but the city has held on to the permits and made Pearl go before the HC. The city knows it is in the wrong, but they do not care at all. They will let Pearl go to Common Pleas court and waste enormous amounts of time getting a judge to order the release of the permits, thus increasing construction/finance costs for Pearl.

    What we have is not conductive to encouraging more investment in the city. A strong Mayor would have ignored the malcontents and simply ordered the release of the permits.

  4. Any results?

Leave a Reply

Comment moderation is enabled, no need to resubmit any comments posted.

Recent Posts
Urban Decay As American As Beer And Apple Pie

Urban Decay As American As Beer And Apple Pie

February 21, 2017  |  The Shadow Knows

The Shadow taps into Philly beer history and frozen pie trivia at the old Adam Scheidt Brewing Company plant on North 9th Street > more

Unlisted Philadelphia: Atlantic Snuff Company

Unlisted Philadelphia: Atlantic Snuff Company

February 17, 2017  |  Unlisted Philadelphia

Architectural illustrator Ben Leech spotlights unique and significant buildings not protected on the local register with his series, Unlisted Philadelphia. In this installment, a High Victorian in Chinatown that's still up to snuff > more

Inside The Empty, Gilded Halls Of Elkins Estate

Inside The Empty, Gilded Halls Of Elkins Estate

February 16, 2017  |  Last Light

Photographer Kris Catherine gives an exclusive look inside the opulent mansions of Elkins Estate > more

Dial Up For The Latest Election News

Dial Up For The Latest Election News

February 14, 2017  |  Harry K's Encyclopedia

Harry K. dials up the Evening Telegraph Information Bureau, a pilot communications service in 1905 that provided Keystone Telephone customers with news and information at a moment's notice > more

La Salle University Threatens Germantown Landmarks

La Salle University Threatens Germantown Landmarks

February 9, 2017  |  Soapbox

On Friday, the Historical Commission will consider legal protections for two historic Germantown homes. Owners La Salle University will oppose the nominations to retain their right to demolition. Arielle Harris makes a case for saving these two Wister family properties and reveals La Salle's long tradition of razing neighborhood landmarks > more

Paging Dr. Typewriter: Healing Old Tech On Fabric Row

Paging Dr. Typewriter: Healing Old Tech On Fabric Row

February 8, 2017  |  Walk the Walk

Bryan Kravitz brings old Remingtons back from the dead at his repair shop in Mt. Airy and typing salon in South Philly. Joe Brin has the story > more